GoodRelations is a standardized vocabulary for product, price, and company data that can (1) be embedded into existing static and dynamic Web pages and that (2) can be processed by other computers. This increases the visibility of your products and services in the latest generation of search engines, recommender systems, and other novel applications.
Martin Hepp
martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org
Tue Dec 31 19:08:44 CET 2013
Hi all: Quick answer: The textual definitions in GoodRelations will soon be polished to reflect the fact that the compensation for a certain offer can include non-monetary assets (e.g. barter trade). Also note that gr:ProductOrService is not disjoint from any other class in GoodRelations, so it is perfectly okay to e.g. offer a gr:Location for sale etc. Martin On Dec 28, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > On 28 December 2013 18:20, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper at wwelves.org> wrote: > I've just watched a video by Manu Sporny on generating and registering Asset & Listing for Web Payments: http://youtu.be/n5KBw7K65hg > > I tried searching http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org for terms *asset*, *listing* with no results and payswarm giving just two: > * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Changelog/20110401 > * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Events/ISWC2012 > > I wonder if some way of aligning between Web Payments and GoodRelations terms exists? > > https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm > http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.html > > I also notice gr:PaySwarm as subclass of gr:PaymentMethod in range of > gr:acceptedPaymentMethods > > Wouldn't at least those terms somehow map to each other: > gr:ProductOrService <-> payswarm:Asset > gr:Offering <-> payswarm:Listing > > One slight difference is that, afaik, GR uses a 3 letter ISO for currency, whereas web payments also allows anyURI, which allows things like virtual currencies to be part of a system. > > So depending on your use cases, it might be that one vocab, is easier to work with than another. Of course, the beauty of the semantic web is that you can mix and match to meet your needs. > > > GoodRelations terms already got included in schema.org and maybe Web Payments could somehow reuse/extend them: > http://schema.org/Product > http://schema.org/Offer | http://schema.org/Demand > > Otherwise publishers may need to mark things as both? > Product & Asset > Offer & Listing > > Thanks for help with clarifying it! > > _______________________________________________ > goodrelations mailing list > goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org > http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations > > _______________________________________________ > goodrelations mailing list > goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org > http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations -------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp twitter: mfhepp Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! ================================================================= * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/