Warning:
This tool or project is no longer maintained and kept available only for archival purposes. Since
GoodRelations and
schema.org have evolved significantly in the past years, the current status available on this page is unlikely to function as expected. We take no responsibility for any damage caused by the use of this outdated work, to the extent legally possible.
Due to a lack of resources, we are unable to provide support for this project outside of consulting projects or sponsored research. Please
contact us if you can contribute resources to update and enhance these resources.
This is the archive of the goodrelations dicussion list
GoodRelations is a standardized vocabulary for product, price, and company data that can (1) be embedded into existing static and dynamic Web pages and that (2) can be processed by other computers. This increases the visibility of your products and services in the latest generation of search engines, recommender systems, and other novel applications.
[goodrelations] GoodRelations and Web Payments (aka. Payswarm)
Melvin Carvalho
melvincarvalho at gmail.com
Sat Dec 28 18:52:27 CET 2013
On 28 December 2013 18:20, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper at wwelves.org>wrote:
> I've just watched a video by Manu Sporny on generating and registering
> Asset & Listing for Web Payments: http://youtu.be/n5KBw7K65hg
>
> I tried searching http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org for terms
> *asset*, *listing* with no results and payswarm giving just two:
> * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Changelog/20110401
> * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Events/ISWC2012
>
> I wonder if some way of aligning between Web Payments and GoodRelations
> terms exists?
>
> https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm
> http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.html
>
> I also notice gr:PaySwarm as subclass of gr:PaymentMethod in range of
> gr:acceptedPaymentMethods
>
> Wouldn't at least those terms somehow map to each other:
> gr:ProductOrService <-> payswarm:Asset
> gr:Offering <-> payswarm:Listing
>
One slight difference is that, afaik, GR uses a 3 letter ISO for currency,
whereas web payments also allows anyURI, which allows things like virtual
currencies to be part of a system.
So depending on your use cases, it might be that one vocab, is easier to
work with than another. Of course, the beauty of the semantic web is that
you can mix and match to meet your needs.
>
> GoodRelations terms already got included in schema.org and maybe Web
> Payments could somehow reuse/extend them:
> http://schema.org/Product
> http://schema.org/Offer | http://schema.org/Demand
>
> Otherwise publishers may need to mark things as both?
> Product & Asset
> Offer & Listing
>
> Thanks for help with clarifying it!
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ebusiness-unibw.org/pipermail/goodrelations/attachments/20131228/44e5d1e1/attachment.html>
More information about the goodrelations mailing list
