GoodRelations is a standardized vocabulary for product, price, and company data that can (1) be embedded into existing static and dynamic Web pages and that (2) can be processed by other computers. This increases the visibility of your products and services in the latest generation of search engines, recommender systems, and other novel applications.
Steven Forth
steven.forth at gmail.com
Wed Jun 24 12:51:40 CEST 2009
There is a deeper issue here that we should think about as a community. Should ontologies be merged or should they be allowed to exist and evolve independently, and be used together through name spacing, an simple upper level ontology, and site specific rules. My own opinion is that at this point in time it is better to allow independent evolution and diversity and find light and loosely linked approaches to using different ontologies together. Steven On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen at openlinksw.com>wrote: > Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: > > Hi Sherman: > > Thanks - Briefly: I think we should integrate the efforts. Basically, > > it is simple to model wants and needs in GoodRelations. You just use a > > gr:Offering with the gr:BusinessFunction gr:Sell - this goes with the > > batteries supplied in the current version of GoodRelations (even > > though I never thought of this application before). > > > > Example: I am interested in buying one TV set with a screen size of at > > least 30 centimeters, and i am not interested in offers more expensive > > than 200 euros: > > > > foo refers to the namespace of the example > > pcs refers to the namespace of a fictuous ontology for product types > > and features (e.g. eclassOWL or others) > > > > foo:martinhepp > > a gr:BusinessEntity; > > gr:offers foo:myWant1. > > > > foo:myWant1 > > a gr:Offering ; > > gr:hasBusinessFunction gr:Buy; > > gr:hasPriceSpecification foo:UnitPriceSpecification_1 ; > > gr:includesObject foo:TypeAndQuantityNode_1 . > > > > foo:myDreamTVSet > > a pcs:TVSet , gr:ProductOrServiceSomeInstancesPlaceholder; > > pcs:hasScreenSize foo:QuantitativeValueFloat_1. > > > > foo:QuantitativeValueFloat_1 > > a gr:QuantitativeValueFloat ; > > gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement "CMT"^^xsd:string ; > > gr:hasMinValueFloat "30.0"^^xsd:float . > > > > foo:TypeAndQuantityNode_1 > > a gr:TypeAndQuantityNode ; > > gr:amountOfThisGood "1.0"^^xsd:float ; > > gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement "C62"@en ; > > gr:typeOfGood foo:myDreamTVSet . > > > > foo:UnitPriceSpecification_1 > > a gr:UnitPriceSpecification ; > > gr:hasCurrency "EUR"^^xsd:string ; > > gr:hasMaxCurrencyValue "200.0"^^xsd:float ; > > gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement "C62"^^xsd:string . > > > > > > In order to make this a bit more beautiful an powerful, I could > > introduce a new objectproperty "seeks" that is used instead of > > "offers" to link between a business entity and an offering. > > > > > > That would be a minimal change to the vocabulary but would allow to > > reverse all BusinessFunctions (e.g. seeks maintance, seeks disposal, > etc." > > > > What do you think? > Neat! > > Kingsley > > > > Best > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > Sherman Monroe wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> I've considering the GoodRelations ontology for overdogg.com wants and > >> needs. Looking at the GR spec [1], I am not able to see anything classes > or > >> properties for describing wants/needs. I created the Things You Want and > >> Need (TIWAN) ontology[2] to model wants/needs as well as reverse > >> auction-style marketplace. I would like to know if a merge between the > two > >> would be something that you would be interested in. I can definitely see > >> where GR plugs into TIWAN, e.g. to describe providers/suppliers. Is > >> wants/needs within the scope of GR, or should I continue using TIWAN > with > >> tie-ins to GR? > >> > >> [1] http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1# > >> [2] http://overdogg.com/ontology/tiwan/ > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> goodrelations mailing list > >> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org > >> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations > >> > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > martin hepp > > e-business & web science research group > > universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen > > > > e-mail: mhepp at computer.org > > phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 > > fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 > > www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) > > http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) > > skype: mfhepp > > twitter: mfhepp > > > > Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! > > ======================================================================== > > > > Webcast: > > http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ > > > > Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: > > "Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology" > > http://tinyurl.com/semtech-hepp > > > > Tool for registering your business: > > http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ > > > > Overview article on Semantic Universe: > > http://tinyurl.com/goodrelations-universe > > > > Project page and resources for developers: > > http://purl.org/goodrelations/ > > > > Tutorial materials: > > Tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A > Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! > SearchMonkey > > > > http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_Tutorial_ESWC2009 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > President & CEO > OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > goodrelations mailing list > goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org > http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations > -- Steven Forth steven.forth at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ebusiness-unibw.org/pipermail/goodrelations/attachments/20090624/fad7f027/attachment.html>