GoodRelations is a standardized vocabulary for product, price, and company data that can (1) be embedded into existing static and dynamic Web pages and that (2) can be processed by other computers. This increases the visibility of your products and services in the latest generation of search engines, recommender systems, and other novel applications.
François-Paul Servant
fps at semanlink.net
Sat Jan 26 13:59:57 CET 2013
In http://www.productontology.org/#faq I read: "DBpedia URIs cannot be used for modeling the type of real-world objects, in particular in the context of the GoodRelations ontology, because - they lack a suitable semantics for being used as classes, and - they are not valid OWL DL." In http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/vso/ns#feature the comment about vso:feature says: "Use DBPedia resources to indicate the features, if possible." I don't see what they should be a difference between a product and a feature of a product wrt their modeling If it is bad to say that foo:mySolderingIron rdf:type dbPedia:Soldering_iron it must also be bad to say that foo:myRegulatedAirConditioner rdf:type dbPedia:Air_conditioner Best, fps