This is the archive of the goodrelations dicussion list

goodrelations

Note that you can now also use

    http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#description

This is mainly a shortcut for RDFa markup so that all basic properties  
are defined in the GoodRelations namespace.

Best

Martin Hepp

On 27.10.2010, at 16:04, Alex Stolz wrote:

> Hello Brian,
>
> if you want to attach long textual descriptions to concepts in  
> GoodRelations you should use rdfs:comment. For shorter labels like  
> for example the product name rdfs:label is recommended.
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
> On 10/27/10 1:50 PM, Brian McBride wrote:
>> I'm planning to the use GR ontology in describing the environmental  
>> impact of goods and services.
>>
>> When I describe a product, i.e. with ProductOrServiceModel I would  
>> like to attach a human readable description of the product or  
>> service that applications may display to a user.  Is there a  
>> recommended practice for this.  I'm using dc:description at present.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> goodrelations mailing list
>> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
>> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>
> -- 
> Dipl.-Ing. Alex Stolz
> E-Business&  Web Science Research Group
> Universität der Bundeswehr München
>
> e-mail:  alex.stolz at ebusiness-unibw.org
> phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4218
> fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
> skype:   stalsoft.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations

This is the archive of the goodrelations dicussion list

[goodrelations] Recommended practice for text description of a good or service